3044am永利集团
SOE
Chow Institute
User Center
中
EN
About WISE
People
Committee of Academic Consultants
Faculty Directory
Staff Directory
Research
Publications
Working Papers
Facilities&Centers
Education
Overview
Undergraduate Programs
Graduate Programs
Study-Abroad MA Programs
Exchange Programs
Executive Education
News & Events
News
Announcements
Conferences
Seminars & Conferences
Job Openings
SOE
Chow Institute
User Center
中
EN
About WISE
Introduction to WISE
Contact Us
Map and Direction
People
Committee of Academic Consultants
Faculty Directory
Staff Directory
Research
Publications
Working Papers
Facilities&Centers
Education
Overview
Undergraduate Programs
Graduate Programs
Study-Abroad MA Programs
Exchange Programs
Executive Education
News & Events
News
Announcements
Conferences
Seminars & Conferences
Job Openings
Research
Home
->
Research
->
Publications
->
Content
Research
Publications
Working Papers
Facilities&Centers
Finance & Economics Experimental Lab
MOE Key Lab in Econometrics
Fujian Provincial Key Lab in Statistics
Center for Econometrics Research
Center for Financial Research
Center for Research in Labor Economics
Center for Macroeconomics Research
Center for Statistics Research
Center for Information Technology
SAS Center for Excellence in Econometrics
High-Speed Computing Cluster
The result of world powers in WTO: A cheap-talk game under different communication protocols
Id:2387
Date:20131201
Status:
ClickTimes:
作者
Yun Wang
正文
Official reports and case studies reveal that China experienced different means of communication with the world powers since it joined the World Trade Organization in 2001. In the first five years, China had public communication with both the United States and the European Union under the Transitional Review Mechanism. In 2006 a new means of communication, the China–US Strategic and Economic Dialogue, started to take effect. Reports show that the new mechanism has advanced the China–US relationship positively and productively. The difference between the two means of communication stimulates our study. We adopt a game theory model to examine the impact of different communication protocols on China's incentives to reveal information. We analyze a cheap-talk game between an informed agent and two uninformed principals who coordinate actions under two communication protocols: public and private communication. First, all equilibria under both means of communication are characterized. Information precision of the agent's equilibrium messages decreases with the principals' preference biases. Second, under private communication the agent communicates more informatively with one principal if she in effect reveals little information to the other. Under private communication there exists an informative equilibrium with asymmetric levels of information precision even when all equilibria under public communication are uninformative.
JEL-Codes:
C72; D82; D83; F13; F53
关键词:
Strategic information transmission; Tacit coordination; Public communication; Private communication; WTO
TOP